Out Of Touch: Hollywood Celeb Worth Millions Says Republicans Don’t ‘Give A Damn About The Country’

DCPundit.com
-
0
Out Of Touch: Hollywood Celeb Worth Millions Says Republicans Don’t ‘Give A Damn About The Country’

(DC Pundit) – Whoopi Goldberg, the ever-opinionated co-host of ABC’s “The View,” unleashed a verbal tirade against Republicans on Thursday. Her accusation? That the GOP is acting like they don’t “give a damn about the country.” Oh, the irony of accusing others of not caring while hosting a show that often resembles a political food fight more than a thoughtful discussion.

Sunny Hostin, Goldberg’s partner in prime-time pontification, kicked off the conversation by expressing concern over the lack of oversight regarding Elon Musk’s actions. “We should have an oversight to look at these things,” Hostin declared.

She continued her lament, saying, “My problem is not the review but who is in office, this unelected billionaire, and what the heck is he doing?” One might wonder if Hostin has the same concerns about other unelected billionaires, such as George Soros, who wield significant influence in various sectors, or if her worry is exclusively reserved for those who don’t share her political views.

Goldberg, never one to be outdone in the realm of hyperbole, chimed in with her own brand of historical revisionism. “I’ve watched 60 years of history get wiped out,” she proclaimed.

Goldberg, in a stunning lack of self-awareness, remarked, “I’ve never seen the Republicans ever act in this fashion, ever, and to not give a damn about the country, to allow it to get torn apart this way is freaking me the hell out.” Has Goldberg been living in an alternate reality where political polarization and partisan bickering are novel concepts introduced solely by Republicans?

The irony of Goldberg’s outrage over “unelected” individuals reviewing government documents is palpable. As any Civics 101 student could tell you, the vast majority of government positions are filled by unelected individuals. But apparently, this fact only becomes problematic when it doesn’t align with Goldberg’s political narrative.

Her sudden concern over transparency and oversight seems to have conveniently materialized just as certain political figures hold power.

The Democratic Party’s reaction to recent exposures of potential corruption bears a striking resemblance to the classic deflection tactic of getting angry at the messenger. It’s as if they believe that by shouting loudly enough about the unfairness of it all, they can drown out the sound of their own misdeeds being brought to light.

The existence of corruption within political circles is hardly breaking news. What’s new is the availability of concrete evidence, the proverbial paper trail that turns suspicions into certainties.

Goldberg’s impassioned plea for political integrity would carry more weight if it weren’t so blatantly one-sided. Perhaps a more balanced approach to criticism, one that acknowledges faults on both sides of the political aisle, would do more to heal the divisions she claims to care so much about.

Copyright 2025. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Library Of Congress/Public Domain

What Does This Former Female Athlete Think About Trump Banning Men From Women’s Sports?

DCPundit.com
-
0
What Does This Former Female Athlete Think About Trump Banning Men From Women’s Sports?

(DC Pundit) – In a move that’s sure to make waves in the pool of political discourse, President Donald Trump has signed an executive order banning men from competing in women’s sports. The signing ceremony, held at the White House on Wednesday, was a veritable who’s who of female athletes, ranging from pint-sized gymnasts to towering basketball players.

“From now on, women’s sports will be only for women,” Trump declared.

The President, never one to shy away from a statistic, stated, “Men claiming to be girls have stolen more than 3,500 victories — that’s a lot — and invaded more than 11,000 competitions designed for women.”

“But all of that ends today, because with this executive order, the war on women’s sports is over,” Trump announced, prompting cheers from the crowd.

The executive order, aptly titled “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports”, cites Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972. This act guarantees that women cannot be denied an equal opportunity to participate in sports.

Trump invited the attendees to gather around him as he signed the order, creating a scene reminiscent of a team huddle before the big game.

Paula Scanlan, a former University of Pennsylvania swimmer and current Independent Women’s Forum ambassador, who had to share a locker room with Lia (formerly Will) Thomas in 2021-22, expressed her excitement about the order to Fox News. “This is so exciting,” she remarked.

“This is just the beginning,” Scanlan added. “Ultimately, this issue will not be over until we get this passed on all three branches of government, until we see cases won at the Supreme Court, until we see Congress pass this.” It seems the race for equality in sports is more of a marathon than a sprint.

While the executive order has been met with cheers from its supporters, critics argue that it oversimplifies a complex issue. They point out that the debate over transgender athletes in sports involves intricate questions that can’t be solved with a single stroke of a pen.

Is it really that complex? Who can honestly say that men, with naturally more muscle, stronger bones and often a huge weight advantage, should be competing against women?

In the game of political sports, Trump has just made a move that’s sure to be analyzed, debated, and discussed long after the final whistle blows.

Copyright 2025. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Phil Roeder

NFL Standing Firm On DEI Ahead Of Super Bowl LIX

DCPundit.com
-
0
NFL Standing Firm On DEI Ahead Of Super Bowl LIX

(DC Pundit) – NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell decided to double down on the league’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies during his annual pre-Super Bowl news conference on Monday. This despite President Donald Trump’s landslide victory in the 2024 election and subsequent efforts to dismantle DEI nationwide, prompting one social media user to label the commissioner as “tone-deaf.”

Goodell’s pledge came in response to a question that was about as subtle as a linebacker blitz. The journalist asked, “In light of Trump’s White House and many companies in corporate America dismantling DEI, how has that made the NFL more steadfast? Have you had feedback from owners, corporate partners, other entities in terms of how the NFL addresses its DEI policies?”

The phrase “how has that made the NFL more steadfast?” left no room for the possibility that the NFL might actually reconsider its stance. It’s almost as if they were reading from the same playbook.

Goodell, never one to miss an opportunity to fumble the truth, proceeded to gaslight listeners for nearly two straight minutes. “We got into diversity efforts because we felt it was the right thing for the National Football League. And we’re going to continue those efforts because we’ve not only convinced ourselves, [but] I think we’ve proven ourselves that it does make the NFL better,” the commissioner said, apparently forgetting that correlation doesn’t equal causation.

The NFL adopted the “Rooney Rule” in 2003, named after the late Steelers owner Dan Rooney. This rule initially required teams to interview at least one “diverse” candidate for head-coaching vacancies. The league has since expanded the rule to cover other staff positions, such as general manager and coordinator. By “diverse,” of course, they mean not white.

Goodell then went on to claim that DEI policies are “fundamental in trying to attract the best possible talent into the National Football League, both on and off the field.” This statement is about as accurate as claiming that a blindfolded quarterback throws the most accurate passes. DEI, by definition, has nothing to do with attracting the best possible talent. It’s like saying you’re going to find the fastest runner by focusing on their shoe size.

The commissioner added a defense of the Rooney Rule to his expanding list of questionable statements. “The Rooney Rule, for us, is not — there’s no requirement to hire a particular individual on basis of race or gender. It’s simply on the basis of looking at a — uh, uh, uh — canvas of candidates that reflect our communities,” he remarked.

Trump’s administration has been taking a sledgehammer to DEI policies nationwide, and public opinion, as reflected by his election, has put corresponding pressure on many businesses and corporations. One social media user summed it up perfectly: “Wow, talk about being tone-deaf,” adding a clown emoji for good measure.

Another user, demonstrating more common sense than the entire NFL front office, described DEI as “literally the opposite of getting best talent.”

Goodell’s statements are about as transparent as a defensive lineman’s excuse for roughing the passer. The league proudly uses skin color to determine a pool of coaching candidates but doesn’t apply the same logic to the NFL draft. There, players rise and fall on merit alone, as they should. It’s almost as if they recognize that on-field performance actually matters.

Moreover, DEI policies conveniently don’t apply to franchise ownership. The owners exempt themselves from the same scrutiny they apply to their coaches and general managers.

If skin color is so crucial in determining coaching or executive positions, why doesn’t the same argument apply to the wealthiest people in the league — the owners?

It’s time for the NFL to tackle its inconsistencies head-on and realize that true diversity comes from embracing talent, regardless of background. Until then, they’ll continue to fumble the ball on this important issue.

Copyright 2025. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: All-Pro Reels, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The Chilling Last Words From This Death Row Inmate Before His Lethal Injection

DCPundit.com
-
0
The Chilling Last Words From This Death Row Inmate Before His Lethal Injection

(DC Pundit) – Texas bid farewell to one of its most notorious criminals on Wednesday. Steven Lawayne Nelson, a 37-year-old convicted murderer, took his final breath in a state execution chamber, leaving behind a trail of chilling words and a bizarre love story.

Nelson brutally ended the life of Rev. Clint Dobson in 2011. His wife of two weeks, Helena Noa Dubois, stood witness to his demise, clutching a white service dog.

“It is what it is,” Nelson reportedly told his newlywed bride. Perhaps he was referring to the irony of finding love just before losing his life. Or maybe he was commenting on the state of Texas’s criminal justice system.

As the lethal cocktail of pentobarbital began its deadly dance through his veins, Nelson, ever the smooth talker, decided to go out with these words: “I’m not scared. I’m at peace. Let’s ride, Warden,” he declared.

In a final act of defiance (or perhaps romance), Nelson mouthed the word “love” twice before his body betrayed him with a brief convulsion. Twenty-four minutes later, he was officially pronounced dead.

Nelson’s rap sheet didn’t end with Rev. Dobson’s murder. While awaiting trial, he managed to add another inmate’s death to his resume.

Nelson’s execution marks the second in the United States for 2025, following South Carolina’s Marion Bowman Jr., who checked out last Friday for a 2001 murder.

Copyright 2025. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Josh Rushing

The $43 Million Gas Station With No Customers – Paid For By US Taxpayers

DCPundit.com
-
0
The $43 Million Gas Station With No Customers – Paid For By US Taxpayers

(DC Pundit) – In the annals of government waste brilliance, few ideas shine as brightly as the brainstorming session that birthed Afghanistan’s very own “Gas Station to Nowhere” back in 2011.

A group of financial wizards, presumably high on their own supply of optimism, decided that what war-torn Afghanistan really needed was a state-of-the-art compressed natural gas station. After all, nothing says “economic revival” quite like a futuristic fuel depot in a country where most people can barely afford a bicycle.

The genesis of this genius plan came from a geological survey that revealed natural gas reserves in northern Afghanistan. Apparently, these experts thought, “Hey, if it works for Texas, why not for Kabul?” Forget about minor details like, oh, I don’t know, the complete lack of infrastructure, ongoing conflict, and the fact that most Afghans were more concerned with finding their next meal than filling up their non-existent cars.

But why let reality get in the way of a good idea? The task force, in its infinite wisdom, poured a cool $43 million into this “proof-of-concept” station. Proof of what concept, you ask? The concept that money can, indeed, be set on fire.

Here’s where it gets really good. The average Afghan would need to fork over more than a year’s salary – about $700 – to convert their car to run on this fancy new fuel. With the average annual income hovering around $690, it’s clear that the target market for this gas station was… absolutely no one. But fear not! The U.S., in its boundless generosity, paid 120 Afghans to convert their cars. Nothing says “sustainable business model” quite like paying your only customers to use your product.

John Sopko, head of SIGAR, summed it up perfectly: “There are too many people in DOD and State and AID who are trying to make Afghanistan look like northern Virginia. That’s the problem.”

The same task force, not content with just one monument to misguided spending, also built a 23,000-square-foot cold-and-dry storage facility in Helmand. Price tag? A mere $3 million. Its purpose? To be a “hub of agricultural development.” Its current use? A very expensive, very empty building. Apparently, checking whether any Afghan businesses could actually use such a massive warehouse was an afterthought. Who needs market research when you have unlimited taxpayer dollars?

These projects are part of a larger pattern of reconstruction efforts that seem to be designed by people who’ve never set foot in Afghanistan. It’s as if they looked at the country – which ranks at the bottom of almost every development index – and thought, “You know what this place needs? More stuff that looks like America!”

The scale and ambition of these projects are so wildly inappropriate for Afghanistan’s reality that one has to wonder if the planners were using a map of the wrong country. Or, perhaps they were… I know this sounds CRAZY, just hear me out, lining their own pockets? Getting rich via the American taxpayer’s money.

In the end, this gas station and its cold storage cousin stand as gleaming testaments to the power of government waste over practical solutions.

As Afghanistan continues to grapple with its many challenges, one can only hope that future aid efforts will be grounded in the country’s actual needs and capabilities. Until then, at least there’s a very expensive, very empty gas station standing as a monument to what happens when taxpayer money goes up in smoke.

Copyright 2025. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Flickr/Gov Tom Wolf

Democrats Protest In Front Of Treasury, Attack Musk’s DOGE, Proclaim “We Are At War!”

DCPundit.com
-
0
Democrats Protest In Front Of Treasury, Attack Musk’s DOGE, Proclaim “We Are At War!”

(DC Pundit) – In a display of political theater that would make Shakespeare blush, a group of Democratic lawmakers decided to throw a little soirée outside the Treasury Department on Tuesday evening. The star of their ire? None other than Elon Musk and his merry band of DOGE enthusiasts.

Leading the charge in this carnival of outrage were Representatives Ayanna Pressley and LaMonica McIver. Rep. McIver, channeling her inner WWE wrestler, bellowed, “We will not take this! We will fight back! And goddammit shut down the Senate! We are at war!”

Not to be outdone, Rep. Pressley decided to spice things up with a dash of pyromania. “I want to say to our Republican colleagues — pay attention. We’re here today in the hopes that you will see the light. But if you do not see the light, we will bring the fire. Resist!” she proclaimed, as Maxine Waters enthusiastically applauded.

But Pressley wasn’t done. In a moment of linguistic creativity she dubbed Musk a “Nazi nepo baby.” One can only imagine the hours of brainstorming that went into crafting such a zinger.

Not to be left out of the fun, Maxine Waters jumped into the fray, unleashing a tirade against Musk. “We have got to tell Elon Musk, ‘Nobody elected your a**. Nobody told you you could get all of our private information. Nobody told you you could be in charge of the payments of this country,'” she declared.

The pièce de résistance came from Senator Elizabeth Warren, who rattled off a list of people who didn’t vote for Musk. “Not one Democrat in America voted for Elon Musk, not one not one Republican in America voted for Elon Musk, not one independent in America voted for Elon Musk, not one libertarian in America voted for Elon Musk, dammit, not one vegetarian in America voted for Elon Musk,” she declared.

This spectacle, dubbed the “Nobody Elected Elon” protest, raises some interesting questions. For instance, when did we start holding elections for every single government employee?

It’s worth noting that while Musk wasn’t elected, he operates within the bounds of existing laws and regulations. If lawmakers have concerns about his influence, the appropriate response would be to propose and pass legislation addressing these issues, not to engage in theatrical protests that do little to advance meaningful dialogue or policy changes.

Copyright 2025. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Gage Skidmore

New York AG Letitia James Calls On Doctors To Ignore Trump’s Order On Minors And Sex-Change Surgeries

DCPundit.com
-
0
New York AG Letitia James Calls On Doctors To Ignore Trump’s Order On Minors And Sex-Change Surgeries

(DC Pundit) – New York Attorney General Letitia James has decided to play a high-stakes game of chicken with the federal government. Her weapon of choice? A strongly worded letter to hospitals, essentially telling them to keep the gender-bending train rolling for minors, federal orders be damned.

James, apparently fancying herself as the Robin Hood of gender reassignment, warned hospitals that following President Donald Trump’s executive order to halt sex change procedures for minors could violate state law. It’s a classic case of “stuck between a rock and a hard place,” with hospitals now caught in a tug-of-war between state and federal authorities.

“Regardless of the availability of federal funding, we write to further remind you of your obligations to comply with New York State laws,” the letter reportedly states. It goes on to say, “Electing to refuse services to a class of individuals based on their protected status, such as withholding the availability of services from transgender individuals based on their gender identity or their diagnosis of gender dysphoria, while offering such services to cisgender individuals, is discrimination under New York law.”

Meanwhile, Trump’s executive order, dramatically titled “Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation,” takes a decidedly different stance. It declares, “It is the policy of the United States that it will not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called ‘transition’ of a child from one sex to another, and it will rigorously enforce all laws that prohibit or limit these destructive and life-altering procedures.”

The order declares, “Across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children under the radical and false claim that adults can change a child’s sex through a series of irreversible medical interventions. This dangerous trend will be a stain on our Nation’s history, and it must end.”

In response to this federal directive, some hospitals have already started to pump the brakes on their gender-affirming treatments for minors. NYU Langone Health, for instance, reportedly canceled appointments for two 12-year-olds who were lined up for puberty blocker implants. It’s worth noting that NYU Langone Health received a cool $815 million in awards from the National Institutes of Health in a recent year. That’s a lot of green to potentially kiss goodbye.

The situation has sparked protests, with the Democratic Socialists of America organizing a demonstration in Manhattan’s St. Vartan park. Protesters brandished signs with slogans like “Protect trans futures” and “Don’t capitulate to hate,” turning the park into a veritable billboard of progressive slogans. At least one protester decided to take an unscheduled tour of the local precinct, courtesy of the NYPD.

This standoff between state and federal authorities over gender-affirming care for minors is not just a legal quagmire; it’s a microcosm of the broader cultural and political divide in America. On one side, we have those who view these treatments as essential healthcare and a human rights issue. On the other, there are those who see them as experimental procedures being performed on children too young to fully comprehend the long-term consequences.

The debate is further complicated by the lack of long-term studies on the effects of these treatments on minors. While proponents argue that they can be life-saving for transgender youth struggling with severe dysphoria, critics point to concerns about potential irreversible physical changes and the possibility of regret later in life.

Copyright 2025. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Alec Perkins

Justice Unleashed: DC Prosecutor’s Bombshell Announcement Spells Trouble For Musk’s DOGE Attackers

DCPundit.com
-
0
Justice Unleashed: DC Prosecutor’s Bombshell Announcement Spells Trouble For Musk’s DOGE Attackers

(DC Pundit) – Acting US Attorney for DC, Ed Martin, has announced his office’s intention to charge and arrest individuals who threatened Elon Musk’s DOGE team. For those not in the know, DOGE is a government agency set up to curb spending by, among other things, modernizing federal technology to maximize governmental efficiency. Who knew fiscal responsibility could be so controversial?

Martin, playing his cards close to his chest like a seasoned poker player, didn’t provide any names as he announced the impending arrests and charges.

“Our initial review of the evidence presented to us indicates that certain individuals and/or groups have committed acts that appear to violate the law in targeting DOGE employees,” Martin stated. He added, “We are in contact with the FBI and other law-enforcement partners to proceed rapidly. We also have our prosecutors preparing.”

Earlier on Monday, Martin sent Elon Musk a letter, assuring him that his office won’t tolerate threats against DOGE workers.

“I recognize that some of the staff at DOGE has been targeted publicly,” Martin wrote to Musk. He continued, “At this time, I ask that you utilize me and my staff to assist in protecting the DOGE work and the DOGE workers. Any threats, confrontations, or other actions in any way that impact their work may break numerous laws.”

Martin’s letter took a turn for the dramatic as he penned, “Let me assure you of this: we will pursue any and all legal action against anyone who impedes your work or threatens your people.” He then took a jab at the Biden administration, stating, “We will not act like the previous administration who looked the other way as the Antifa and BLM rioters as well as thugs with guns trashed our capital city. We protect DOGE and other workers no matter what.”

The drama began when tech reporters at Wired decided to out a list of DOGE workers who gained access to the US Treasury payment system over the weekend. Reporters at Wired tweeted a list of DOGE workers, leading to others doxxing and threatening them. Elon Musk then warned the reporters that they had committed a crime.

The Trump Administration put two top leaders at the US Agency for International Development on leave after they refused to give Elon Musk’s DOGE classified documents. John Vorhees and Deputy Brian McGill claimed the DOGE employees didn’t have the security clearance for the classified materials. However, it turns out no classified material was accessed without proper clearance.

The X account responsible for the doxxing has since been suspended.

Copyright 2025. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Flickr/MINISTÉRIO DAS COMUNICAÇÕES

Big Approval In The Big Apple: Trump Matches Highest Ever Polling Numbers In New York

DCPundit.com
-
0
Big Approval In The Big Apple: Trump Matches Highest Ever Polling Numbers In New York

(DC Pundit) – President Trump’s favorability rating in the deep blue Empire State has hit a record high. The man who once called New York home is now experiencing a surge in popularity that’s about as unexpected as finding a cheap apartment in Manhattan.

According to the latest Siena College poll released Monday, Trump’s approval rating in New York has climbed to a whopping 41%. To put this in perspective, the last time Trump’s favorability was this high in his former stomping grounds was back in December 2016, just before he took office for the first time. Apparently, absence does make the heart grow fonder – or at least less hostile.

What’s driving this sudden surge of Trump love in the land of liberal leanings? It seems the President’s tough stance on illegal immigration is striking a chord with New Yorkers. A staggering 79% of voters in the Siena survey support Trump’s efforts to deport illegal migrants who have been convicted of a crime. It’s almost as if New Yorkers have decided that some laws are worth enforcing after all – who knew?

A majority of New Yorkers (54%) believe Trump will do an “excellent” or “good” job securing the country’s borders.

Siena pollster Steven Greenberg commented on the results, saying, “President Trump has not been popular in his former home state for more than a decade. And while that is still true, Trump now has his best favorability rating, 41-56%, since the month before he took office the first time, December 2016, when his favorability rating was 41-53%.” In other words, Trump is about as popular in New York as pineapple on pizza – controversial, but gaining traction.

The poll results break down along party lines, with Republicans viewing Trump favorably at 83-13%, while Democrats maintain their disapproval at 17-81%. Independents, true to form, are sitting on the fence at 48-46%.

This surge in Trump’s popularity coincides with recent actions by federal immigration agents in the Big Apple. Last Tuesday, heavily armed agents stormed through the city, targeting those with warrants for serious crimes like murder and kidnapping. Among those arrested was Anderson Zambrano-Pacheco, a 25-year-old alleged ringleader of the notorious Venezuelan prison gang Tren de Aragua. He was apprehended in a Bronx apartment, proving once again that New York real estate can be full of surprises.

Is Trump’s rising popularity in New York fully a result of his immigration policies? Perhaps it’s a combination of factors, including the realization that Trump’s brash, no-nonsense style isn’t all that different from the average New Yorker’s demeanor.

Copyright 2025. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: RawPixel

Mexico Waves White Flag: Agrees To Send Border Troops In Bid To Avoid Tariffs

DCPundit.com
-
0
Mexico Waves White Flag: Agrees To Send Border Troops In Bid To Avoid Tariffs

(DC Pundit) – In a turn of events that many see as a confirmation of the Trump administration’s strong stance on illegal immigration, Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum has agreed to dispatch 10,000 troops to the country’s northern border. This sudden about-face comes after days of chest-thumping and declarations of Mexican sovereignty that would have made Pancho Villa proud.

President Donald J. Trump, never one to shy away from making a deal, announced on Monday morning that Mexico had finally seen the light – or perhaps the looming shadow of a 25% tariff. The agreement allows Mexico a one-month reprieve from new tariffs, during which time officials from both countries will attempt to hammer out a new deal.

Sheinbaum, in a desperate attempt to save face, took to social media to assure her constituents that her conversation with Trump was “respectful.” She confirmed the deployment of 10,000 National Guard troops to combat fentanyl trafficking, conveniently forgetting her earlier cries for Mexican independence.

Over the weekend, Sheinbaum and her political allies had been busy rallying support on social media, calling for Mexicans to stand firm against Trump’s influence. Their posts were a veritable fiesta of nationalistic phrases and calls for respect.

However, Sheinbaum’s sudden change of heart didn’t go unnoticed. Critics were quick to point out the elephant in the room – or should we say, the donkey in the drug cartel. Allegations that her party, Morena, has benefited from drug traffickers have been circulating faster than a spinning piñata. These claims have recently been echoed by the Trump White House.

As for President Sheinbaum, she might want to invest in a good pair of huaraches – all that backpedaling can be tough on the feet.

Copyright 2025. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: © Tomas Castelazo, www.tomascastelazo.com/Wikimedia Commons

1...444546...61Page 45 of 61

Join The Fight

Your monthly donation, regardless of size, empowers us to deliver hard-hitting news free from external influences.

Donate Today

Latest

VIDEO: Schumer Says The Quiet Part Out Loud — Warns SAVE Act Could Remove Millions Of Illegals From Voter Rolls

Elections 0
URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT! (DC Pundit)...

Is This Real Life? Minnesota Democrats Request Study On The “Benefits Of Shoplifting” (VIDEO)

Crime 0
URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT! (DC Pundit)...

RINO Lindsey Graham Goes Full War Hawk — Waves Hat And Declares “Cuba Is Next!” (VIDEO)

Military 0
URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT! (DC Pundit)...

Sitemap

Html code here! Replace this with any non empty raw html code and that's it.

Privacy Policy - Contact Us

© 2025 DCPundit.com - All Rights Reserved.