VIDEO: Schumer Says The Quiet Part Out Loud — Warns SAVE Act Could Remove Millions Of Illegals From Voter Rolls

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – Chuck Schumer just delivered one of the best arguments for passing the SAVE Act, and he didn’t even mean to. The Senate Minority Leader was clearly in panic mode this week when he warned reporters about the dangers of election integrity legislation, but his complaint backfired spectacularly.

While speaking to the press, the New York senator claimed that the SAVE Act would purge millions of people from the voter rolls. Does he mean illegal aliens and dead people? It’s probably safe to assume he does, because who else would need purging from voter registration lists?

This is exactly why millions of patriotic Americans support the SAVE Act.

Does Schumer even realize what he’s saying here?

Schumer is essentially admitting that there are millions of questionable registrations on the books, people who shouldn’t be voting in American elections. Whether it’s illegals, deceased individuals, or phantom voters who moved years ago, Schumer just confirmed they exist in substantial numbers.

For years, Democrats have insisted that voter fraud is a myth, that concerns about election integrity are baseless conspiracy theories, and that anyone questioning the security of our elections is a dangerous extremist. Yet here’s their Senate leader warning that cleaning up voter rolls would remove millions of registrations. If those millions are all legitimate voters, why would cleaning the rolls affect them?

The answer is obvious: they’re not legitimate. And Schumer knows it.

The SAVE Act is designed to ensure that only American citizens can vote in American elections, a concept that should be completely uncontroversial but has somehow become a partisan flashpoint. The legislation would require proof of citizenship for voter registration, something most Americans assume is already required.

It’s time to pass the SAVE Act and have real election integrity for the first time in years. Chuck Schumer just accidentally explained exactly why.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Flickr/AFGE

Is This Real Life? Minnesota Democrats Request Study On The “Benefits Of Shoplifting” (VIDEO)

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – In a state where shoplifting by Somali migrants occurs at a rate 10 times higher than the general population, Minnesota Democrats have decided the real problem isn’t the crime itself, it’s that we haven’t properly studied the “benefits of shoplifting.”

Let that sink in for a moment. Benefits. Of shoplifting.

Minnesota State Representative Krista Knudsen pulled back the curtain on this insanity, exposing what happened during a recent Labor Committee meeting. “Today in the Labor Committee, Representative Dave Pinto requested a study for the benefits of shoplifting,” Knudsen revealed, her disbelief practically radiating through the statement.

The committee was supposedly gathered to discuss how to stop organized shoplifting plaguing Minnesota retailers. You know, actually solving the problem that’s forcing stores to close and driving up prices for law-abiding citizens. But instead of focusing on stopping criminals, Democrats decided they needed to explore whether there might be some hidden silver lining to theft.

Apparently, when your state is hemorrhaging money from rampant retail crime, the logical response is to commission a study on why stealing might actually be good.

Representative Knudsen didn’t mince words about the absurdity of this proposal. “There are no benefits to shoplifting for the people that are being shoplifted from. I have no idea what else to say. I’m shocked,” she stated. “Who benefits from shoplifting? The criminals.”

It’s a question so obvious that a kindergartener could answer it, yet it apparently escapes Minnesota’s Democratic legislators.

Instead of enforcing laws, protecting businesses, and holding criminals accountable, Democrats would rather waste taxpayer money studying whether crime might have redeeming qualities.

Minnesota has become a cautionary tale of what happens when soft-on-crime policies meet open-border ideology. Shoplifting rates among certain migrant populations are skyrocketing, stores are being forced to lock up basic necessities behind glass cases, and retailers are fleeing the state entirely.

This is the same backwards thinking that brought us “defund the police,” progressive prosecutors who refuse to prosecute, and bail reform that puts violent criminals back on the streets within hours. Now they want to legitimize shoplifting by finding its “benefits.”

Minnesota residents watching their communities deteriorate under Democratic mismanagement have a choice to make. They can continue electing officials who think criminals deserve sympathy studies, or they can demand leaders who actually believe in law and order.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Grok

RINO Lindsey Graham Goes Full War Hawk — Waves Hat And Declares “Cuba Is Next!” (VIDEO)

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – Some politicians in Washington are careful with their words, choosing them with the precision of a surgeon. Others… not so much. Senator Lindsey Graham falls squarely into the second category.

The South Carolina Republican — known as a RINO by conservatives frustrated with his long history of interventionist foreign policy — appeared on Sunday Morning Futures with host Maria Bartiromo and seemed positively thrilled while discussing the ongoing military pressure on Iran.

Graham spoke enthusiastically about airstrikes connected to “Operation Epic Fury,” which has involved Israeli and American military actions targeting Iranian assets. While discussing the situation, Graham sounded less like a cautious lawmaker and more like someone already planning the next stop on a geopolitical tour.

The senator then pivoted from Iran to the communist island just 90 miles from Florida’s coast, a nation that has been under authoritarian rule for decades. The United States has maintained tense relations with Cuba since the Cold War, and the island’s regime remains a point of contention in American politics, particularly among Cuban-American voters in Florida.

Graham appeared eager to expand the conversation.

During the interview, he even pulled out a hat promoting Cuban freedom while suggesting that bigger changes could be coming. The senator hinted that once hostile regimes are confronted, momentum could carry forward elsewhere.

He didn’t exactly whisper the idea either.

“Iran is going down, and Cuba is next!” Graham boasted.

To be clear, there has been ongoing speculation in political circles that if the Trump administration succeeds in weakening the Iranian regime and opening the door to democratic reforms, it could inspire broader pressure against other authoritarian governments. That discussion, however, usually happens in think tanks and policy circles — not with celebratory hats on cable television.

For many conservatives who prioritize an America First foreign policy, Graham’s enthusiasm raises familiar concerns about the old guard of Washington foreign policy thinkers who never seem to meet a regime change they don’t like.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Gage Skidmore

Epstein Prison Guard Made Mysterious Bank Deposit And Googled Him Minutes Before Body Was Found

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – Newly released Department of Justice documents are raising even more red flags about Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged suicide back in 2019.

According to records obtained by the New York Post, Tova Noel, one of Epstein’s prison guards at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, was actively googling his name just minutes before he was found dead.

The Post reported that “Noel googled ‘latest on Epstein in jail’ at 5:42 a.m. and then again at 5:52 a.m. — less than 40 minutes before her colleague, correctional officer Michael Thomas, found the disgraced financier dead in his cell by hanging at 6:30 a.m., according to an FBI record of Noel’s internet search history that night.”

So let’s get this straight: instead of actually watching the most high-profile prisoner in America, a man who had dirt on countless powerful elites, Noel was sleeping, shopping online, and mysteriously searching for updates about him right before his death. Nothing suspicious there, right?

Noel, who previously admitted to falsifying records after Epstein died but magically escaped charges thanks to a so-called judge, flat-out lied when confronted about her Google searches.

“I don’t remember doing that,” she claimed, according to an FBI transcript. She also insisted that FBI records were not “accurate” and stated she did not recall looking him up. How convenient that her memory failed her on such a critical detail.

Here’s where things get really interesting. Noel made a mysterious $5,000 deposit just 10 days before Epstein’s death. This came after other suspicious cash deposits also appeared in her bank account. Did the DOJ bother asking her about this sudden influx of money? Of course not. Why would they want to know where a prison guard watching America’s most valuable witness got thousands in unexplained cash?

An internal FBI briefing uncovered in the DOJ files revealed the agency believed Noel was the orange “flash” moving toward Epstein’s jail cell the night he died. An orange flash. Moving toward his cell. Right before he died. But sure, let’s all pretend this was a straightforward suicide.

Adding another layer to this increasingly bizarre story, Noel has since been sued in Westchester County Supreme Court for alleged assault at her current job as a medical office assistant at Montefiore Einstein Advanced Care.

Could she have been capable of helping carry out an infamous prisoner’s death, perhaps just looking the other way and keeping her mouth shut? The evidence certainly raises questions that deserve answers.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: DOJ

James Talarico’s Progressive Spin On Faith Clashes Directly With Biblical Truth (VIDEOS)

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – Texas State Rep. James Talarico, fresh off his Democratic primary win for U.S. Senate, loves to wave the Bible around like a campaign prop. The 36-year-old Austin Democrat, a former middle school teacher now chasing a divinity degree at a Presbyterian seminary, bills himself as a faith warrior taking on “Christian nationalism.” But for Bible-believing Republicans and evangelicals, who represent the backbone of American Christianity, his sermons and soundbites are a perversion of God’s Word. It’s as if he’s auditioning for the role of “Leftist Theologian,” cherry-picking verses to prop up progressive politics while ignoring the parts that don’t fit his script.

Talarico’s rise from classroom to Capitol has been fueled by viral moments where he blends faith with far-left talking points. But when you stack his statements against what most Christians actually believe—rooted in the unchanging truth of Scripture—it starts looking less like devotion and more like distortion.

Take abortion, for starters. On “The Joe Rogan Experience” in July 2025, Talarico claimed the Bible is silent on this issue, pointing to the Annunciation in Luke 1 where the angel Gabriel asks for Mary’s consent before the incarnation. He spun it as proof that “you cannot force someone to create,” essentially green-lighting abortion as a matter of choice. He repeated this on “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” in early 2026, insisting the Bible has “nothing to say about abortion.” And in a New York Times opinion video, he doubled down, saying Christians shouldn’t fixate on it since it’s not mentioned. Funny how he skips over Exodus 20:13’s clear “Thou shalt not kill,” or Psalm 139:13-16 where God forms life in the womb, or even Luke 1:41-44 showing the unborn John leaping for joy at Jesus’ presence. For the millions of pro-life Christians who see every child as sacred, this isn’t biblical, it’s a convenient lie.

Then there’s his stance on LGBTQ issues and gender. Talarico has said the Bible never mentions gay marriage or same-sex relationships, telling Rogan there’s no “historical, theological, or biblical basis” for opposing them. In a 2021 Texas House speech against a bill protecting women’s sports, he declared “God is non-binary” and that trans kids are “made in God’s own image,” perfect as they are. He even called Jesus a “radical feminist” in a church sermon. Most Christians, guided by Leviticus 18:22, Romans 1:26-27, and Genesis 2:24, see this as a direct clash with God’s design for sexuality and family. It’s like he’s reading a different book altogether, perhaps one edited by the cultural elite.

His views on salvation add another layer of head-scratching. Quoting Matthew 25, he said Jesus judges us by “feeding the hungry, healing the sick, welcoming the stranger”—making it sound like good works punch your ticket to heaven. On X, he’s posted videos stressing aid for immigrants and the poor as the key to judgment. He even claimed some atheists are “more Christ-like” than Christian lawmakers, and his faith isn’t “anti-gay.” Ephesians 2:8-9 clearly states salvation is by grace through faith, not works, so no one can boast. Talarico’s spin reduces the Gospel to a social services checklist, ignoring sin and redemption through Christ.

And on politics, Talarico warns against theocracy, calling it the “most dangerous form of government” in videos and sermons, while fusing his own faith with left-wing causes. He rejects blending religion and state—except when it suits progressive goals. Conservatives see this as hypocritical: true faith shapes all of life, including standing against cultural shifts that mock God’s order.

Faithful patriots know the real threat is watering down God’s word to fit the times. True faith defends Biblical truth, not trends. Stand firm, America’s soul depends on it.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Grok

Bizarre Moments At Jackson’s Funeral: Kamala’s Fake Accent, Biden Touts His Intelligence, Obama Trashes Trump (VIDEOS)

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – Former Presidents Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden descended upon Chicago, Illinois this week for Jesse Jackson’s memorial service, and what should have been a dignified farewell quickly devolved into exactly what you’d expect from the left: a political hit job on President Trump’s administration.

Hillary Clinton and Jill Biden were also in attendance at the service honoring the controversial civil rights activist, who passed away last month at the age of 84 after battling progressive supranuclear palsy, a rare neurodegenerative disorder.

True to form, failed presidential candidate Kamala Harris couldn’t resist injecting her now-infamous fake accent.

“Let me just say I predicted a lot about what’s happening right now. I’m not into saying I told you so but we did see it coming,” Harris proclaimed, apparently unable to resist patting herself on the back even at a memorial service.

“But what I did not predict is that we would not have Jesse Jackson with us right now to help us get through this,” she continued, managing to make the moment about her political grievances rather than honoring the deceased.

But Harris was just the warm-up act. Barack Obama took the stage and fully transformed Jesse Jackson’s funeral into a political circus, launching into a bitter tirade against the Trump administration.

“Everywhere we see greed and bigotry being celebrated, and bullying and mockery masquerading as strength,” Obama declared, apparently forgetting that funerals are typically about the person who died, not about trying to score cheap political points.

He wasn’t finished. “We see science and expertise denigrated while ignorance and dishonesty and cruelty and corruption are reaping untold rewards,” Obama continued his rant. “Every single day we see that, and it’s hard to hope,” he said.

The audacity of turning a memorial service into a campaign rally is staggering, even by Democrat standards. But then again, this is the same party that politicizes everything from natural disasters to sporting events, so why should funerals be off-limits?

Biden also made an appearance, telling the congregation, “I am a hell of lot smarter than most of you.” Nothing screams respect and decorum quite like insulting mourners at a funeral.

This shameful display is precisely why Americans are tired of the Democrat establishment’s endless grievance theater. Even death can’t stop them from grandstanding.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: The White House

VIDEO: Nancy Mace Exposes The DISGUSTING Betrayal—RINOs And Democrats Joined Forces To Protect Ilhan Omar

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace just pulled back the curtain on exactly why nothing ever gets done in Washington. The spineless Republicans In Name Only have joined hands with radical Democrats to kill her subpoena targeting Rep. Ilhan Omar’s questionable immigration records. So much for draining the swamp.

Mace, who’s been fearlessly leading the charge to expose the alleged immigration fraud involving Omar and her supposed “brother-husband,” didn’t sugarcoat the betrayal. “That’s Congress for you, nothing will happen!” she declared in a recent interview, confirming what conservatives have suspected all along: the establishment protects its own, party labels be damned.

The South Carolina firebrand made headlines back in January during a House Oversight Committee hearing examining massive Somali-linked fraud schemes that have been bleeding Minnesota taxpayers dry under Gov. Tim Walz’s disastrous leadership. During that hearing, Mace officially moved to subpoena Omar’s immigration documents, including records for Ahmed Elmi—the man Omar allegedly married in what critics claim was a fraudulent scheme to manipulate the U.S. immigration system.

But here’s where it gets infuriating. In her bombshell interview with Lindell TV, Mace revealed that Republicans, not Democrats, killed her motion to obtain these records. Let that sink in for a moment.

“Well, what’s happened so far? I think the remark is always, ‘Let the process play out.’ That’s what they always say—and nothing ever happens,” Mace explained. “I tried to subpoena her immigration records and her brother-husband’s immigration records, and it was Republicans that killed my motion.”

She didn’t stop there. “As far as I know, nothing’s going on. Nothing will go on. That’s Congress for you—because both sides protect the other.”

There it is, folks—the uniparty in action. While President Trump works tirelessly to restore America’s sovereignty and enforce our immigration laws, supposed Republicans in Congress are busy protecting one of the most controversial members of “The Squad” from legitimate scrutiny. These aren’t representatives of the people; they’re gatekeepers for the establishment.

Mace’s courage in calling out this backroom betrayal deserves recognition. While RINOs cower and make excuses, she’s fighting for transparency and accountability—exactly what voters sent her to Washington to do.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Gage Skidmore

Fetterman Torches Fellow Democrats For Opposing Iran Strikes — “They’re Afraid To Agree With Trump On Anything” (VIDEO)

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – John Fetterman, one of the more unpredictable voices in the Democratic caucus, appeared on Jesse Watters Primetime and took direct aim at fellow Democrats for their reaction to military strikes on Iran authorized by President Donald Trump.

Fetterman suggested the real issue inside the Democratic Party isn’t the policy itself. It’s who happens to be sitting in the Oval Office.

For years, Democrats repeatedly warned that Iran could never be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. That position was practically a talking point requirement across the party. Yet when the Trump administration took aggressive steps against Iran, support from the left quickly evaporated.

Fetterman called out that contradiction directly.

“So you know, when someone did that and made sure that possible, why can’t we, as a Democrat, just say, hey, I think that’s a good thing. I think that the world’s safer,” Fetterman remarked.

That kind of honesty is rare in Washington, particularly when it involves criticizing one’s own team. But the Pennsylvania senator’s frustration appears to reflect a growing divide between ideological activists and Democrats who recognize that national security isn’t supposed to be a partisan game.

Washington politics has become so tribal that some politicians would rather reject their own policies than admit their opponents might occasionally be right.

As Fetterman suggested, the reasoning seems fairly simple. If Trump supports it, they oppose it.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Gov Wolf/Flickr

VIDEO: Whoopi Goldberg Stands By Bill Clinton After His “No Idea” Epstein Testimony

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – ‘The View’ co-host Whoopi Goldberg quickly sprang to the defense of former President Bill Clinton after he told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that he had “no idea” about the crimes committed by disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, despite his documented associations with him.

As images of Clinton alongside Epstein and longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell were discussed on air, Goldberg pushed back on the criticism.

“You know, say what you want about the Clintons. Have any of the women or has anything in those emails pointed to them as being guilty or having anything to do other than knowing?” Goldberg said.

She didn’t stop there.

“But my question is, has he been accused by any of the accusers?” Goldberg asked, before continuing, “Has any of the women come out and said, ‘This is what Bill Clinton did’?”

That was the central thrust of her argument: absent a direct accusation from one of Epstein’s victims, critics should withhold judgment.

House investigators have spent months examining the web of relationships surrounding Epstein. Questions have also surfaced about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her interactions with Maxwell.

As Breitbart’s Sean Moran reported, “Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claimed that she met Jeffrey Epstein-associate Ghislaine Maxwell ‘on a few occasions’ despite widespread reporting that Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s wedding and played a substantial role in the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), one of President Bill Clinton’s signature post-White House endeavors.”

Those are not exactly fleeting, passing connections.

For conservatives who have watched years of media obsession over alleged associations on the right, the contrast is hard to ignore. When Republicans are photographed within a zip code of controversy, it’s blasted across headlines like a national crisis unfolding in real time. When Democrats offer “no idea” as an explanation, mainstream media appears ready to move along.

Voters, however, have long memories — and they tend to ask more questions than a daytime talk show panel.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Library Of Congress/Public Domain

Supreme Court Delivers Unanimous Immigration Victory To Trump — With Justice Jackson Writing The Opinion

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – For a Supreme Court that rarely agrees on what to order for lunch, let alone on anything involving President Donald Trump, a unanimous decision is news. Big news. And yet, if you blinked, you might have missed it.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed President Trump a unanimous victory on immigration, ruling that federal courts must defer to the factual findings of immigration judges. In plain English: lower courts can’t casually override immigration judges just because they feel like it. For an administration committed to enforcing immigration law as written, that matters.

The decision tightens the reins on asylum challenges by reaffirming that courts must apply a “substantial-evidence standard” when reviewing whether an asylum seeker would face “persecution” if deported. That’s not a minor technical tweak. It raises the bar for overturning deportation decisions and makes it harder to game a system that has been strained for years.

And here’s the part that likely caused more than a few cable news producers to spill their lattes: the opinion was authored by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, one of the court’s three liberal justices and a Biden appointee.

Jackson made the standard crystal clear. Immigration judges’ determinations are not suggestions. As she wrote, “The agency’s determination… is generally ‘conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.’” That language reinforces just how steep the climb is for those seeking to overturn those rulings in federal court.

Jackson also emphasized the high threshold courts must meet before reversing immigration judges’ findings, a move that will likely make it more difficult for migrants to successfully challenge deportation orders as the Trump administration continues its enforcement efforts.

Curiously, the ruling hasn’t exactly dominated headlines in the legacy press. When the Supreme Court rules against Trump, it’s often treated like a five-alarm fire. When it rules unanimously in his favor — with a liberal justice holding the pen — the volume seems to drop.

Funny how that works.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: David