DCPundit.comTruth Over Comfort, Facts Over Fiction

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – The James Comey “86 47” beach photo story just got significantly more damning, and investigative reporter Paul Sperry has the details.

According to Sperry, evidence has emerged showing that Comey’s wife Patricia sent him a Google screenshot of a non-violent definition of the term “86” just two minutes before Comey posted his now-infamous Instagram photo of rocks arranged to spell out “86 47” on the beach. The timing is not subtle. If Comey’s photo was truly an innocent observation about a “cool shell formation on my beach walk” — as he described it — why would his wife be sending him definitions of the term moments before he posted it?

For those unfamiliar with the slang: “86” is a widely recognized street term meaning to eliminate or kill someone. Combined with “47” — the numerical designation of the 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump, the message reads as a threat against the sitting president’s life. Comey and his wife, it appears, thought they were being clever. They were not clever enough.

BREAKING: An FBI affidavit for a search warrant in the James Comey presidential threat case reveals his wife Patrice Comey sent him a Google screenshot of a nonviolent definition of the term “86” two (2) minutes before Comey posted the alleged threat against President Trump,…

— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) August 15, 2026

James Comey was indicted by a grand jury in the Eastern District of North Carolina on two felony counts in May. Count One charges him with knowingly and willfully making a threat to take the life of, and to inflict bodily harm upon, the President of the United States. Count Two charges him with knowingly and willfully transmitting in interstate and foreign commerce a communication containing a threat to kill the President, Donald J. Trump.

North Carolina-based U.S. District Judge Louise Flanagan, a George W. Bush appointee, has agreed to postpone Comey’s trial date to October.

This is not just any former government official facing criminal charges. James Comey served as Director of the FBI under both Presidents Obama and Trump before being fired by Trump in 2017. He was one of the central figures in the Russia investigation and has long been accused by conservatives of leading what amounted to an institutional effort to undermine Trump’s first term, alongside Barack Obama and former CIA Director John Brennan.

The evidence Sperry describes, a wife texting her husband a definition of the slang term he was about to use in a public post threatening the president, two minutes before posting, goes directly to the question of intent. Comey’s defense has presumably centered on the idea that the photo was innocent. The two-minute timestamp makes that argument considerably harder to sustain.

October cannot come soon enough.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Brookings Institute

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – Something remarkable is happening in Dearborn, Michigan, and it should concern every American who believes in the constitutional right to free speech and peaceful assembly.

Dearborn Police Chief Issa Shahin released a video message urging city residents to stay away from the August 18th city council meeting because “anti-Islam protesters,” including activists planning a “Christian Crusader March” to “Stop Islamification,” are expected to show up and exercise their First Amendment rights.

“Please stay home,” Shahin said.

Let that sink in. A sitting police chief is asking residents to avoid a public government meeting, not because of a credible threat, but because American citizens intend to show up and protest. Shahin claims the expected demonstrators are coming to provoke residents, manufacture a confrontation, and generate publicity. That may or may not be true of their intentions. But, provocative speech is still protected speech in the United States of America.

This is so insane. A Police Department in America is now putting out their updates in Arabic

That viral message from Dearborn police chief Issa Shahin warning of people coming to oppose the Islamic invasion at the upcoming city council meeting was put out on Facebook in Arabic… pic.twitter.com/pv446B7A4V

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) August 13, 2026

Dearborn has become one of the most discussed cities in the ongoing debate about America’s cultural and demographic transformation. The city is now majority Arab and heavily Muslim. Islamic calls to prayer broadcast outdoors through residential neighborhoods. Mayor Abdullah Hammoud previously told a Christian resident he was “not welcome” in the city, a statement that would have generated wall-to-wall national media coverage if the religious identities involved were reversed.

The situation in Dearborn has grown increasingly tense in recent months. Pro-Hezbollah and Iranian-linked imagery has appeared at local processions. Activist Jake Lang was attacked during the city’s massive Arbaeen procession just weeks ago, an event that featured flags of U.S.-designated terrorist groups.

Dearborn police say they will deploy an “enhanced presence” and have prepared what the department describes as a comprehensive security plan for the meeting. That is entirely appropriate, maintaining order and protecting everyone in attendance, including the protesters, is exactly what law enforcement is supposed to do.

What is not appropriate is a police chief telling American citizens to stay away from their own city council meeting because he is uncomfortable with who else might show up. The solution to speech you disagree with is not silence, it is more speech, better arguments, and law enforcement that protects everyone’s right to participate equally in the democratic process.

If Dearborn’s leadership cannot guarantee the safety of American citizens exercising constitutionally protected rights in a public forum, that is a failure of governance that demands accountability, not a video telling people to stay home.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Screenshot

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – Nancy Pelosi would like you to believe she was completely in the dark about Joe Biden’s cognitive decline right up until the moment he imploded on national television during a June 2024 debate against Donald Trump. The woman who served as Speaker of the House, one of the most powerful positions in Washington, and who built her entire career on political intelligence and insider knowledge, expects the American public to accept that she simply had no idea.

Sure, Nancy.

Speaking Tuesday at Politico’s The California Agenda: Sacramento Summit, Pelosi offered her explanation for why she was allegedly caught off guard. “You see, when I was Speaker, I saw the president all the time, but when I wasn’t then I saw him maybe 3 times that whole year and so I didn’t know, and I think he had his sort of ups and downs,” she said.

Three times in a year. And apparently none of those three encounters raised any red flags for one of the sharpest political operators in Democratic Party history. Remarkable.

Pelosi then made clear she believes someone absolutely did know, and took a barely veiled shot at Jill Biden in the process. “I do think those who did know should have acted upon that information…whoever knew,” she said pointedly. She followed that up with: “There was staff saying the family knew. The family said the staff.” Jill’s name was never mentioned. It didn’t need to be.

Nancy Pelosi claims she didn't know Biden was mentally declining:

“I saw him maybe 3 times that whole year…so I didn't know. But I do think those who did know should have acted upon that information…whoever knew.” pic.twitter.com/ldl6sghJ9s

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 11, 2026

As for when Pelosi claims the truth finally became clear: “When you think of the debate and how sad that was, that’s really when we learned.”

The debate. June 2024. That’s the story she’s going with.

Meanwhile, Jill Biden’s own recent interviews are doing her no favors in the credibility department. Earlier this year, the former First Lady laughed while discussing how she covered for her husband’s cognitive decline during an appearance on the TODAY show. She also insisted, against all observable evidence, that Biden could have beaten Trump if he had stayed in the race. “I believe he would have beat Donald Trump in that election,” she said.

But then came the question that cut through everything. When asked by MS NOW host Jonathan Lemire whether Biden would have been able to serve as president had he won, Jill Biden’s answer was stunning in its candor: “I don’t know the answer to that.”

She doesn’t know if the man she was pushing to remain on the ballot could have actually done the job.

In a separate CBS Mornings interview, Jill Biden brushed the whole issue aside with casual indifference. “Oh, he was definitely aging; I mean, we were all aging,” she told host Rita Braver. “So, yes, he was slowing down.”

Slowing down. That’s one way to describe a president whose own wife isn’t sure he could have functioned in office. The American people deserve far better than what they were given, and far more honesty than they’re getting now.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: Bruce Detorres

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

(DC Pundit) – Ilhan Omar just handed every future primary challenger to a handful of Republican senators the perfect campaign ad, and she did it with a smile on her face.

During a Thursday town hall, Omar openly praised what she called “bipartisan” partners in the Senate who are working to kill the SAVE America Act, the legislation that would require proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections. She wasn’t subtle about it.

“One of the other things we are staying vigilant and watching out for is the President’s number one priority, which is the SAVE Act,” Omar told the crowd. “We believe that is a piece of legislation that is going to disenfranchise so many people from their ability to vote.”

The “so many people” Omar is concerned about protecting are, of course, not American citizens, because American citizens already have and can easily obtain the ID required under the bill. The people who stand to lose access to the ballot under the SAVE Act are those who have no legal right to vote in the first place. Omar knows this. Her constituents know this. And apparently, so do the Republican senators she is now publicly thanking.

“We do have, fortunately, partners in the Senate that are bipartisan that are advocating for the bill not to be passed,” Omar said, beaming.

Rep. Ilhan Omar Personally thanks the Establishment GOP Senators for NOT Passing “The Save Act” that 85 Percent of Americans want! John Thune she means you and your lack of leadership! pic.twitter.com/EdAFKCTPC1

— Johnny Midnight ⚡️ (@its_The_Dr) August 7, 2026

One of those partners is Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a Republican, theoretically, who has repeatedly refused to push the SAVE Act forward. More than 20 Republican senators have called for canceling the August recess until the legislation passes. Thune has refused. Last month, he went so far as to suggest there is no path forward for the bill, claiming that postponing recess would not be “in anybody’s best interest.”

Somebody should ask Thune whether he thinks having Ilhan Omar publicly thank him for his help is in anybody’s best interest.

The stakes here are significant. Without passing the SAVE Act, proof of citizenship and voter ID requirements will not be in place for the upcoming midterm elections. Democrats, and apparently their Republican partners, are counting on exactly that outcome.

President Trump has called the SAVE America Act his number one priority. He laid out evidence of foreign interference in American elections in a primetime address and called on Congress to act. And yet the Senate Majority Leader, a member of Trump’s own party, is standing in the way, earning the open gratitude of one of the most radical members of Congress in the process.

Republican voters put these senators in office to fight for America First, not to earn the gratitude of Ilhan Omar.

URGENT: CLICK TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE LEFT!

Copyright 2026. DCPundit.com | Featured image credit: POMED